<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Architecture on Ricardo Martins — Cloud Architecture, Azure, Kubernetes &amp; AI</title>
    <link>https://rmmartins.com/tags/architecture/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Architecture on Ricardo Martins — Cloud Architecture, Azure, Kubernetes &amp; AI</description>
    
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 18:05:48 -0400</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://rmmartins.com/tags/architecture/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Cloud Maturity Is Not About Being 100% Cloud</title>
      <link>https://rmmartins.com/2026/01/23/cloud-maturity-is-not-about-being-100-cloud/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2026 10:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <guid>https://rmmartins.com/2026/01/23/cloud-maturity-is-not-about-being-100-cloud/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;For years, &amp;ldquo;cloud-first&amp;rdquo; has been treated as a badge of honor. Companies proudly announce that everything is in the cloud, architects optimize for migrations instead of outcomes, and teams equate progress with how little infrastructure they still own.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But after working with dozens of real systems, across different industries and at different scales, one thing becomes clear.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Cloud maturity is not about being 100% cloud.&lt;/strong&gt;
It is about knowing &lt;em&gt;why&lt;/em&gt; each workload is where it is.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
